Meeting-room requirements.
What gets built is what was said in a room, not what happens in the operation.
AI by product phase · Discovery
Half of all projects fail because they solve the wrong problem. We start by measuring what the problem costs today and deciding whether software is the answer. Sometimes it is not, and we say so.
What gets built is what was said in a room, not what happens in the operation.
With no clear limit, the project grows until the budget runs out.
If you do not know what it costs today, you cannot know whether the solution pays.
Two or three weeks. You come out with the decision made, the scope fixed and a budget — even if the decision is not to do it.
How it works today, where it breaks and who holds it up. Observed, not assumed.
Hours, errors and lost opportunities, in euros. The basis for deciding.
What is in, what is out and how it gets built. With a fixed price.
If a process change or an existing tool solves it, that is the recommendation.
Functionality, limits, risks and acceptance criteria.
Price and timeline per phase, no open-ended hours.
What gets built first and why that before the rest.
What stands in for a case of our own here is the method, not a product: the six that are in production all started in this phase, and one of its possible outcomes was not to build. ADG came out of measuring what it cost a public body not to know its digital maturity; Eco-Impacto, out of the fact that the sensor data existed and nobody was looking at it. Measuring the cost of the problem before writing code is what stops you building the wrong thing very well.
Hours from the people holding it together by hand, errors that get paid for and opportunities lost. Without that number there is no way to know whether software pays off.
Turns a hunch into an investment decision.
We interview whoever operates it and follow one case end to end. Almost always two steps show up that nobody knew existed.
Scope stops resting on what people think happens.
What is in, what is not and in what order. What is out gets documented so it cannot come back through the side door halfway through.
It is what stops scope opening on its own.
If the problem is solved by changing the process, buying something that already exists or doing nothing, we say so. Charging to build the unnecessary is easy and expensive for both sides.
A timely no is worth more than a whole project.
The industry has fallen in love with "AI-first". But the real bottleneck in adoption was never technological: it is the absence of a way of thinking about processes. A reflection on the discipline that should come before touching AI.
Where do you start implementing AI? Most people answer with a hunch. But deciding where AI goes is a quantifiable problem: it has variables, formulas and a rankable result. This article is that model, with a case worked through step by step.
Not sure where to start? Measure your organisation’s AI maturity for free in 3 minutes, or book 30 minutes of direct diagnostic.
Tell us what costs more than it should. We come back with a concrete plan, realistic timelines and a clear yes or no.
contacto@plantekia.com