The sheet arrives the next day.
Production is known a day late. Shift decisions are taken blind.
AI by industry · Industry and manufacturing
Production sheets on paper, incidents in Excel and maintenance by calendar. We come in through shop-floor data capture and turn it into quality control, predictive maintenance and planning on real information.
Production is known a day late. Shift decisions are taken blind.
Defects caught late, rework and batches rejected by the customer.
Maintenance by calendar, not by condition. The machine stops at the worst possible moment.
We start with one line or one machine. We measure the return before extending it to the plant.
We digitise the shift sheet and connect machines (OPC-UA, PLC, sensors) to a live panel.
See serviceComputer vision or rules over process data to catch the defect before it leaves the station.
See serviceAlerts by the machine’s real condition, not by date. Intervention history integrated.
See serviceOrders, stock and capacity talking to each other. Planning that sees the plant as it actually is.
See serviceOEE, stoppages and rejects by line, shift and part number.
Every alert says why it fired. The maintenance lead decides.
On-premise or cloud. The shop-floor data does not leave unless you want it to.
We do not yet have a published product of our own in manufacturing, and we are not going to invent one. What we do transfer is the engineering that holds up our platforms in production: capturing data from heterogeneous sources, normalising it and turning it into auditable decisions. That is exactly what Eco-Impacto does with waste sensors on public streets — field telemetry, continuous ingestion, an operational panel and metrics a third party can verify. Swapping a bin for a production line means changing the connector and the data model, not the architecture.
The operator records on a tablet or the PLC sends it on its own. OEE, stoppages and rejects per shift visible the same day, not in Monday’s meeting.
Typical first project: one line, 4–6 weeks.
Computer vision or rules over process variables that warn before the part moves on. The defect is corrected where it is produced, not at final inspection.
Attacks the cost of rework and rejected batches.
Vibration, consumption or temperature outside the pattern trigger a warning with the machine’s history in front of you. Maintenance decides; the model does not give orders.
Turns an unplanned stoppage into a planned one.
Orders and stock from the ERP cross-referenced with the capacity the plant has today, not the theoretical one. Delivery commitments that can be met.
Reduces missed delivery promises.
Automating is not the goal: it is the tool. The expensive mistake is not automating badly, it is automating the wrong thing. This is the no-hype guide to deciding which processes to automate first, and which to leave alone.
Everyone says "we use AI". Almost nobody explains how it decides. That difference, between a black box that spits out answers and a system you can audit, is what separates a reliable tool from a legal risk with good marketing. This is what auditable AI really means.
Not sure where to start? Measure your organisation’s AI maturity for free in 3 minutes, or book 30 minutes of direct diagnostic.
Tell us what costs more than it should. We come back with a concrete plan, realistic timelines and a clear yes or no.
contacto@plantekia.com