Data scattered around.
ERP, CRM, spreadsheets and forms. The same indicator comes out differently depending on who calculates it.
AI by process · Data and decision-making
Reports that arrive late, figures that do not agree and decisions made on last week’s data. We unify the sources and leave one single version, queryable in natural language.
ERP, CRM, spreadsheets and forms. The same indicator comes out differently depending on who calculates it.
The report lands on Wednesday with data from the previous Friday.
Beautiful dashboards that do not answer the question the manager is actually asking.
We start with the three questions that really get asked every week, not with the full catalogue of metrics.
A warehouse with the data from your systems, with agreed definitions for every metric.
Designed around the real decisions of the business, not around what the tool ships with.
The system warns when an indicator leaves its range. Nobody has to watch the dashboard.
Ask in text and get the figure along with the query that produced it. Verifiable.
Here there is a case of our own: ADG is in production and is exactly this — ingesting public data from heterogeneous sources, normalising it and turning it into indicators a third party can verify. Eco-Impacto does the same with telemetry from sensors on public roads. Swapping a public observatory for a company dashboard means changing the connector and the data model, not the architecture.
ERP, CRM, spreadsheets and the shop-floor system unified into one model, with the business rule written once and not in every report.
Ends the meeting about which figure is the right one.
Questions in your own words over the real data, returning the figure and the query that produced it. Whoever does not know SQL stops waiting for whoever does.
Analytics reaches the person who decides.
The system flags an indicator moving outside its expected range, with the context of what changed. Nobody has to open the dashboard to find out.
The data goes looking for the person.
From the indicator to the record behind it in one click. Without that, no dashboard survives the first time somebody doubts a number.
Trust in the data is what makes it usable.
Where do you start implementing AI? Most people answer with a hunch. But deciding where AI goes is a quantifiable problem: it has variables, formulas and a rankable result. This article is that model, with a case worked through step by step.
The industry has fallen in love with "AI-first". But the real bottleneck in adoption was never technological: it is the absence of a way of thinking about processes. A reflection on the discipline that should come before touching AI.
Not sure where to start? Measure your organisation’s AI maturity for free in 3 minutes, or book 30 minutes of direct diagnostic.
Tell us what costs more than it should. We come back with a concrete plan, realistic timelines and a clear yes or no.
contacto@plantekia.com